As we've been caught up in the plight of a gay Congressman and his untoward online conversations, something that really matters has been going on in Iraq: a battle to end the insurgency in Baghdad. It has been an especially deadly week for Americans there, but the thought is that if Baghdad becomes balkanized, the entire nation will be lost.
I don't write much about the war nowadays because I have nothing new to say. I worry about it, because I don't see a way in which we can ever leave behind a nation which stands a chance of remaining a democracy. The history of the Middle East is full of one tyrant defeating another, then another, and so on. If the majority of Iraqis begin to see us as comparable to an occupying Roman legion, then what will happen when we are gone? Most likely, the strongest group of terrorists will establish a Taliban-like dictatorship/theocracy.
I know a man locally named Joe who went to Iraq as a civilian contractor. I asked him about his thoughts on the Iraqi people and their view on Americans. He said that they do see us as interloping occupiers, but that they had been taught for at least a generation to hate Americans---it was one of the basic tenets of Saddam Hussein's regime. Thus, Joe was not surprised by the Iraqis' attitude.
One thing I see missing in Iraq is a group of Founding Fathers. Even though revisionists have done their best to make our founders look like lucky white guys, those of us who know better realize that they were an extraordinary group of human beings. They had frailties, as we all do, but they risked everything for an idea that had not been tried in modern times. Most of them could have continued to live their lives in relative comfort as British subjects. And as a parent state, England was by no means an oppressor. They needed the American Colonies as much as the Colonies needed England. The War for Independence was just that: not a revolution (like in France) wherein all the old traditions and beliefs were thrown out the window, but a statement that we wanted to be our own nation. It was just that simple. We kept many of the British traditions and started some of our own, but even today we have many things in common.
Iraq has never known independence as we know it. Their government has always been a dictatorial third party with little concern for the welfare of the common man. No amount of American manpower and aid can let the "Arab Street" know what independence is about. Instead, the lesson will have to be taught by Iraqis, by brave men and women who are willing to risk everything for an idea. The idea is stronger than any radical Islamic sham religion, but it doesn't seem that way right now. The people will have to be sold on the idea.
In short, Iraqis need Iraqi heroes. They need a George Washington, who made sure that the Presidency did not become a position of royalty and who gave up power at a time when he could have become a dictator for life. They need a Benjamin Franklin, who sold the idea of the United States to Europe and who, without a doubt, was the first American as we know them today. We are who we are because of these men and many others whose names we may never know. Without Founding Fathers of their own, I'm afraid that Iraq will remain a nation divided by both religion and the very concept of what a nation is.
Posted by Matthew at October 5, 2006 09:52 PMTrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.opaquelucidity.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/889
It is a mistake to hope that Iraq will ever become a democracy as we know it, because our two countries could not be more different. When the US was born it was full of bright-eyed, energetic, talented European expatriates. They had a common cause and the means and motivation to break away from England. There was disagreement, but it could be resolved because they all had fairly similar backgrounds and ways of thinking.
In contrast, Iraq is an artificial grouping of ancient tribes that have ancient feuds. They've had optimism beaten out of them over and over again, and the smart ones have moved away, if not because of Saddam then because of the current situation. Even if there are some high-caliber potential leaders remaining, Matt, would these founding fathers of yours be Sunni, Shia, or Kurd? Would they embrace the other sects? Because if they would, then they would have little credibility with their own groups, which...is kind of the point.
Even the US had to hash out its differences -- at a terrible price -- not that long after the country was formed. If we had to have civil war, is it surprising that the Iraqis, who have the baggage of centuries of conflict are fighting?
I’m no expert, but I do know that the average Iraqi has an entirely different priority system than we do. Many Americans are willingly die for their country, whereas an Iraqi would die for family and religion before they’d even consider dying for country. A theocracy is repugnant to us, but it’s sort of inevitable when you put religion before other forms of government. Implicit in the “beacon-of-democracy” vision of Iraq is that the individuals do not want a theocracy – but that it is being forced upon them. That is probably not the case.
I'm sure you mean well, Matt, but living in a dream-world doesn’t help. In fact it makes it worse, because your line of thinking is what got us into this situation -- a situation that even now you don't understand. I despise all dictators too, be they secular or theological, and would prefer a world devoid of them, but that’s just not realistic in the foreseeable future.
In trying to remake just one country in our image, we’ve demonstrated what the rest of the world feared before but now know: it’s our way or nothing. Ironically that’s exactly what the UK was telling us at the time of the founding fathers, and we told them exactly where to go. It’s no surprise we’re meeting fierce resistance, and that the resistance will only increase. It was incredibly naïve to assume that it wouldn’t.
at October 6, 2006 06:55 AM
I hate to admit it but I agree with almost everything nmexpat said. I think all we can realistically hope for is a peaceful theocracy that believes in treating it's people decently and that all the infidels don't have to die. I would love to see a democracy like ours take shape but I just don't see it happening. I posted a comment some time ago that addressed this issue and would fit in well here. If I knew which post it was under I would link to it.
Posted by: FCastle25
at October 7, 2006 11:04 AM