March 03, 2009

The Worlds Thy Hand Hath Made, Continued

I find that my choice in audiobooks reflects my mood at any given moment, so you can imagine what I've been thinking about with my last two selections: '2001' by Arthur C. Clarke and 'Pale Blue Dot' by Carl Sagan, who also read the work. One is fiction, the other a treatise on mankind's future in space. They speak to the same central theme: the universe is enormous and we really don't know anything about it.

I take something else from these works as well, that being the idea that the universe was not made for us. We are certainly a part of it, but we are a nearly invisible speck of dust in the corner of a giant machine whose size and purpose remain unknown to us.

Early Christians borrowed heavily from the Greeks and Egyptians in thinking the Earth is the center of the universe. After all, the stars and the Sun seem to move around us. The planets do not make neat paths, but that could be explained away with a complicated system of loops. An Earth-centric universe became so accepted by the Middle Ages that to deny it was seen as hypocrisy. As humans, we are above the animals and made in the image of God. As God's children, why would we not be at the center of His creation?

Now we know that our little planet is in an average Solar System in the arm of a common galaxy whose siblings number in the billions. We are not at the center of things; in fact, we can not realistically determine where the center is. With a universe expanding into an infinite space of something we know nothing of, there can be no center. Everywhere is the center, and nowhere is the center. Plus, the universe was here long before human beings showed up. In fact, the universe was over 10 billion years old before the Earth was formed. Planets and stars had been born, lived their lives, and died in that span. And we weren't here to see it.

So are we still God's children? Certainly. But we are not alone. I believe we will someday find children of God in all sorts of places. Their relationship with Him may be different in the same way a child's relationship with the divine is different from an adult's. They may know Him in ways we do not. Or they may look to us for enlightenment. Either way, I believe we will find the universe teeming with intelligent life, all of it in His image.

Imagining human beings as being the only intelligent creatures in the universe holds a certain arrogance. This is not our universe, but God's. It is for His glorification, not for ours. To think his Greatness is somehow centered on humanity with all our frailties is hard for me to imagine. We are His children, but we are using His playground.

Posted by Matthew at March 3, 2009 11:46 AM
Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.opaquelucidity.com/movabletype/mt-tb.cgi/1437

Comments

Matt, you hit the nail on the head with the end of this post. The universe does not exist to glorify us or be conformed to our desires - it was made for the glorification of its Maker. Stewardship and ownership are two vastly different things.

Posted by: Michael at March 3, 2009 12:53 PM

God's word makes no mention of any other creation. Therefore who are we to think God made more beings? Now if we had some scripture that mentioned others beings in other worlds then that would clearly give us reason to consider it. Just because the universe in unending doesn't mean there must be more of "us". It would be more of us because all beings are made in His image. The Word tells us the beggining and the end of time. Nowhere in those words are we taught to seek out other life or to ponder the vast empty or inhabited universe. No arrogance at all to KNOW that we are God's creation and the only one. We need God, He doesn't need us. The other scenario puts God in the roll of a puppetmaster.

Posted by: Erik at March 16, 2009 09:32 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?